I've heard it said that there are no known cases in which DNA evidence cleared someone of murder after the person was executed for the murder. I don't know whether it's true, but if it is, could the reason be that there's some sort of law against it for some reason? Spending money on a posthumous investigation won't bring the wrongly executed person back to life, and the prosecutor would rather not be humiliated.
Orignal From: What does the law have to say about testing DNA to clear someone of murder after the execution?
Post a Comment